User:Bryan Hilderbrand/Meeting Notes (18DEC): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
#** Customers' Developers | #** Customers' Developers | ||
#**: [[File:Concept vs Technical.png|border|400px]] | #**: [[File:Concept vs Technical.png|border|400px]] | ||
# {{Agenda presenter|Rich}} | |||
#* We have a solution for MW+, Meza! | |||
#* Software Version Description | |||
#** Known set of software that plays well together | |||
#** Use git | |||
#* Different approach from Software <--> Templates/Forms/etc. | |||
#** Doesn't use git | |||
#** Need to bring wiki content under version control (like git) | |||
#*** Totally agree {{Agenda presenter|Ad}} | |||
#*** Could store it on git {{Agenda presenter|Yaron}} | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Eric-Jan}} | |||
#** Draw up a list of standard products Ad & Yaron agree on | |||
# {{Agenda presenter|Rich}} | |||
#* Document Management is a good package idea | |||
#* I've been working on a solution and have it deployed on my wikis | |||
# {{Agenda presenter|Richard}} | |||
#* Need to define a list of requirements | |||
#** Requirements are at the core of my world {{Agenda presenter|Rich}} | |||
#** Good requirements just mean, "I provide this" | |||
# {{Agenda presenter|Yaron}} | |||
#* ISO seems like a good "product" |
Revision as of 22:35, 31 December 2020
Meeting notes for MediaWiki "Products" Discussion (Fri Dec 18 16:00-17:00 UTC 2020)
Attendees
- Ad Strack van Schijndel
- Bryan Hilderbrand
- Eric-Jan van Kakerken
- Greg Rundlett
- Ike Hecht
- Lex Sulzer
- Lexi McGillivray
- Markus Glaser
- Rich Evans
- Richard Heigl
- Yaron Koren
- Introductions
- Yaron
- 30s Elevator Pitch
- Rich
- Does this represent a way to pay for things? (buy a fix for an issue, etc.)
- What is the governance model?
- Markus
- Like a common core? Or a collection of Use Cases (Templates + Use Cases)?
- Each product would be MW + Extensions + Templates/Forms Yaron
- MWStake already exists, should this be under their umbrella?
- Could be. Or Open Semantic Data Association (OSDA) Yaron
- Like a common core? Or a collection of Use Cases (Templates + Use Cases)?
- Ad
- This is similar to the talk I gave at SMWCon2020 called "MediaWiki based open source content services platform" (YouTube link)
- We need a "common foundation" (MW + Extensions + Search + etc.)
- Internally we have a tool to "sync" via git
- We have CRM & Workflow modules
- Could have a menu with a dropdown so people can add other "Products"/"Components"/"Modules"
- I think it's better to sell each thing as a stand-alone Product without overselling it as something that "does everything". Better to undersell & then grow Yaron
- Richard
- We need a distribution of MW+
- Something like the "Sunflower Distribution" (discussed during an MWStake meeting on 04OCT19 link)
- Eric-Jan
- "Content Services Suite"
- Ad
- I think we should focus on the platform with one approach
- We can do that in parallel Yaron
- I think we should focus on the platform with one approach
- Lex
- Rich
- We have a solution for MW+, Meza!
- Software Version Description
- Known set of software that plays well together
- Use git
- Different approach from Software <--> Templates/Forms/etc.
- Doesn't use git
- Need to bring wiki content under version control (like git)
- Totally agree Ad
- Could store it on git Yaron
- Eric-Jan
- Draw up a list of standard products Ad & Yaron agree on
- Rich
- Document Management is a good package idea
- I've been working on a solution and have it deployed on my wikis
- Richard
- Need to define a list of requirements
- Requirements are at the core of my world Rich
- Good requirements just mean, "I provide this"
- Need to define a list of requirements
- Yaron
- ISO seems like a good "product"