Event:106: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Event |mwstake-meeting=No |title=Board Meeting |start-date=2020/05/08 |start-hour=14 |start-minute=00 |end-date=2020/05/08 |end-hour=15 |end-minute=00 |attendees=Bryan Hilde...") Â |
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) (→â€)  |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|attendees=Bryan Hildebrand, Cindy Cicalese, Eric-Jan, Evita Hollis, Lex Sulzer, Mark Hershberger, Markus Glaser | |attendees=Bryan Hildebrand, Cindy Cicalese, Eric-Jan, Evita Hollis, Lex Sulzer, Mark Hershberger, Markus Glaser | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Meeting agenda== | ==Meeting agenda== | ||
# '''Review Dues Schedule'' Â | # '''Review [[Bylaws/Dues|Dues Schedule]]''' | ||
# '''Credit Card Payments''' Â | # '''Credit Card Payments''' | ||
 | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
# '''Dues Schedule''' | # '''Dues Schedule''' | ||
#* (Eric-Jan) Evita and I worked on the Dues Schedule | |||
#* (Eric-Jan) The Platinum level cost was lowered to be more realistic | |||
#* (Eric-Jan) Gold, Silver, and Bronze were changed appropriately | |||
#* (Eric-Jan) Max Users were updated | |||
#* (Eric-Jan) Votes were changed | |||
#* (Eric-Jan) Quantified guaranteed projects & benefits | |||
#* (Markus) Question about Platinum Projects & Events, does this mean that MWStake will coordinate the event? | |||
#** (Bryan) I believe this would give them the right to have a conference/event under the MWStake umbrella, but they would need to coordinate it (i.e. NASA sponsors an event at their facility and coordinates it with minor help from MWStake. | |||
#* (Lex) Can we just pay for more votes? For example if almost enough was given to fund a project, can someone just pay the last part to see it completed? | |||
#** (Evita) There was some discussion about this at EMWCon | |||
#** (Bryan) If someone only wants code written and are willing to pay the total, they can pay a developer themselves at any time. | |||
#** (Bryan) I think there is an idea of a marketplace and an idea of voting that are being combined. The idea of a "wanted functionality" marketplace is compelling, but voting isn't only about code, but things like the next Board Member, Conference location, spending money on marketing, etc. | |||
#* (Cindy) I see a few issues: | |||
#** I see a problem with the guaranteed projects, the way it is written, a Platinum member would get both (8 hours and 16 for a total of 24) | |||
#** Discounted registration could be difficult if there is a large company that sends everyone | |||
#** Guaranteeing a talk? This should be checked with the Program Chair | |||
#** Branding the event could be a problem since MWStake doesn't "own" SMWCon or EMWCon | |||
#** The "Max Users" doesn't make sense, I propose it should be removed | |||
#* (Eric-Jan) {{Action}} We should start a page to further clarify details to address all these questions. The main page is an overview, the new page will dive deeper | |||
#* (Markus) Do we want to allow Board Member nomination? It could lead to a take-over | |||
#** (Eric-Jan) Possibly a "Non-voting" Board Member position? | |||
#* {{Action}} Evita to update the Dues schedule based on the discussion | |||
#* (Mark) Called a vote to allow a waiver of notice to schedule another meeting in 2 weeks | |||
#** Vote received unanimous approval | |||
#** {{Action}} Mark to schedule follow-up meeting | |||
# Credit Card integration | |||
#* (Mark) We need to look into this. | |||
==Action board== | |||
{{Actionable board | |||
|Open | |||
|{{PAGENAME}} | |||
|MWStake | |||
|True | |||
|View | |||
|{{PAGENAME}} | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:21, 8 May 2020
 Date (UTC):
|
8 May 2020 14:00:00 - 8 May 2020 15:00:00
|
|---|---|
 Attendees:
|
Bryan Hildebrand, Cindy Cicalese, Eric-Jan, Evita Hollis, Lex Sulzer, Mark Hershberger, Markus Glaser |
Click for time zone conversion
Meeting agenda
- Review Dues Schedule
- Credit Card Payments
Notes
- Dues Schedule
- (Eric-Jan) Evita and I worked on the Dues Schedule
- (Eric-Jan) The Platinum level cost was lowered to be more realistic
- (Eric-Jan) Gold, Silver, and Bronze were changed appropriately
- (Eric-Jan) Max Users were updated
- (Eric-Jan) Votes were changed
- (Eric-Jan) Quantified guaranteed projects & benefits
- (Markus) Question about Platinum Projects & Events, does this mean that MWStake will coordinate the event?
- (Bryan) I believe this would give them the right to have a conference/event under the MWStake umbrella, but they would need to coordinate it (i.e. NASA sponsors an event at their facility and coordinates it with minor help from MWStake.
- (Lex) Can we just pay for more votes? For example if almost enough was given to fund a project, can someone just pay the last part to see it completed?
- (Evita) There was some discussion about this at EMWCon
- (Bryan) If someone only wants code written and are willing to pay the total, they can pay a developer themselves at any time.
- (Bryan) I think there is an idea of a marketplace and an idea of voting that are being combined. The idea of a "wanted functionality" marketplace is compelling, but voting isn't only about code, but things like the next Board Member, Conference location, spending money on marketing, etc.
- (Cindy) I see a few issues:
- I see a problem with the guaranteed projects, the way it is written, a Platinum member would get both (8 hours and 16 for a total of 24)
- Discounted registration could be difficult if there is a large company that sends everyone
- Guaranteeing a talk? This should be checked with the Program Chair
- Branding the event could be a problem since MWStake doesn't "own" SMWCon or EMWCon
- The "Max Users" doesn't make sense, I propose it should be removed
- (Eric-Jan) ACTION ITEM We should start a page to further clarify details to address all these questions. The main page is an overview, the new page will dive deeper
- (Markus) Do we want to allow Board Member nomination? It could lead to a take-over
- (Eric-Jan) Possibly a "Non-voting" Board Member position?
- ACTION ITEM Evita to update the Dues schedule based on the discussion
- (Mark) Called a vote to allow a waiver of notice to schedule another meeting in 2 weeks
- Vote received unanimous approval
- ACTION ITEM Mark to schedule follow-up meeting
- Credit Card integration
- (Mark) We need to look into this.
Action board
See this page for more information
| Open | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||