Edit Event: Event:106

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: member.
You do not have permission to edit pages in the Event namespace.

Cancel

MWstake Meeting?

Yes No

Title:

MWstake meeting

Start Date:

Start Time (UTC):

:

End Date:

End Time (UTC):

:

URL:

Tags:

Attendees:

==Meeting agenda==
# '''Review [[Bylaws/Dues|Dues Schedule]]'''
# '''Credit Card Payments'''

==Notes==
# '''Dues Schedule'''
#* (Eric-Jan) Evita and I worked on the Dues Schedule
#* (Eric-Jan) The Platinum level cost was lowered to be more realistic
#* (Eric-Jan) Gold, Silver, and Bronze were changed appropriately
#* (Eric-Jan) Max Users were updated
#* (Eric-Jan) Votes were changed
#* (Eric-Jan) Quantified guaranteed projects & benefits
#* (Markus) Question about Platinum Projects & Events, does this mean that MWStake will coordinate the event?
#** (Bryan) I believe this would give them the right to have a conference/event under the MWStake umbrella, but they would need to coordinate it (i.e. NASA sponsors an event at their facility and coordinates it with minor help from MWStake.
#* (Lex) Can we just pay for more votes?  For example if almost enough was given to fund a project, can someone just pay the last part to see it completed?
#** (Evita) There was some discussion about this at EMWCon
#** (Bryan) If someone only wants code written and are willing to pay the total, they can pay a developer themselves at any time.
#** (Bryan) I think there is an idea of a marketplace and an idea of voting that are being combined.  The idea of a "wanted functionality" marketplace is compelling, but voting isn't only about code, but things like the next Board Member, Conference location, spending money on marketing, etc.
#* (Cindy) I see a few issues:
#** I see a problem with the guaranteed projects, the way it is written, a Platinum member would get both (8 hours and 16 for a total of 24)
#** Discounted registration could be difficult if there is a large company that sends everyone
#** Guaranteeing a talk?  This should be checked with the Program Chair
#** Branding the event could be a problem since MWStake doesn't "own" SMWCon or EMWCon
#** The "Max Users" doesn't make sense, I propose it should be removed
#* (Eric-Jan) {{Action}} We should start a page to further clarify details to address all these questions.  The main page is an overview, the new page will dive deeper
#* (Markus) Do we want to allow Board Member nomination?  It could lead to a take-over
#** (Eric-Jan) Possibly a "Non-voting" Board Member position?
#* {{Action}} Evita to update the Dues schedule based on the discussion
#* (Mark) Called a vote to allow a waiver of notice to schedule another meeting in 2 weeks
#** Vote received unanimous approval
#** {{Action}} Mark to schedule follow-up meeting
# Credit Card integration
#* (Mark) We need to look into this.

==Action board==
{{Actionable board
|Open
|{{PAGENAME}}
|MWStake
|True
|View
|{{PAGENAME}}
}}

Cancel

Edit Event: Event:106

Navigation menu

Search