Event:131: Difference between revisions

From MWStake
Jump to navigation Jump to search
()
()
 
Line 12: Line 12:
==Notes==
==Notes==
The meeting voice transcription is available on the [[Event_talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].
The meeting voice transcription is available on the [[Event_talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].
# '''20215 key goals to focus on'''
# '''2021 key goals to focus on'''
## MWStake Membership
## MWStake Membership
##* Credit Card processing for all options (individual, corporate, donations, conference tickets, etc.)
##* Credit Card processing for all options (individual, corporate, donations, conference tickets, etc.)

Latest revision as of 17:47, 20 January 2021

Blank.png Date (UTC): 15 January 2021 03:30:00 - 15 January 2021 04:00:00

Person.png Attendees: Bryan Hildebrand, Cindy Cicalese, Eric-Jan, Lex Sulzer, Mark Hershberger, Markus Glaser

Click for time zone conversion

Notes

The meeting voice transcription is available on the talk page.

  1. 2021 key goals to focus on
    1. MWStake Membership
      • Credit Card processing for all options (individual, corporate, donations, conference tickets, etc.)
      • Acquiring new members
      • Acquiring new sponsors
    2. Project Canasta/MediaWiki Open Source Content Services Platform (MOSCoSP)
      • Agreeing on a direction and supporting it
    3. Conference Participation
      • Taking on more responsibility for planning
    4. MWStake "Machinery/Processes"
      • Board Membership
      • Member (individual) voting
    5. Social Media Outreach
      • Handling the MWStake Twitter account
      • Promoting conferences
  2. Eric-Jan Eric-Jan's email
    • To me a strategy is no more (or less) than a plan of action to achieve our long-term goals. These goals should be defined and are consistent with our mission and vision. So, step 1 is to define long-term goals and step 2 is the plan how to achieve these goals. The plan comes down to: Who does what and when should it be ready.
    • As far as strategy and goals are concerned, last year we have been mainly focusing on facilitating MediaWiki Stakeholder membership. This should be finalized by a working payment system and by getting new members on board. The acquisition plan to find members was adopted in April 2020.
    • There are 2 current initiatives that require to determine our position and role on the strategic agenda:
      1. Project Canasta
      2. MediaWiki Open Source Content Services Platform (MOSCoSP)
    • We could revitalize and review our workboard as potential input for our goals.
    • What’s our position to conferences as the recently held SMWCon Fall 2020 and the scheduled EMWCon Spring 2021?
    • To summarize for today’s agenda I would propose to discuss the long-term goals and the linked plan as concrete deliverables.
  3. Project Canasta/MediaWiki Open Source Content Services Platform (MOSCoSP)
    • Markus We (MWStake) are good at coordination, we can help with that
    • Markus We could try to bring the 2 efforts together and acta as a hub to bring people together
    • Cindy I agree, the worst possible outcome is to have both efforts split into two competing ideas.
    • Cindy We can ease the demands & provide a bridge.
    • Cindy Help connect each effort with community & experts
    • Mark It seems we are in agreement, this meets with our strategic plan. What's the next step?
    • Eric-Jan Someone needs to understand each goal & determine what is complimentary & unique so that both efforts can align and support the stakeholder needs, then work to accelerate them.
    • Lex What is the status of MOSCoSP?
    • Eric-Jan Between Wikibase Solutions and Hallo Welt!, we have 40 developers working in this.
    • Mark I hate the name (MOSCoSP), propose "MediaWiki Open Source COntent services Workshop" (MOSCOW)
    • Cindy MOSCoSP is enchancing MW to be ready for an Open Source Content Services platform
    • Cindy Canasta is more about the process (PX) to handle the transfer/download/install of the packages
  4. Marketing
    • Eric-Jan Another goal is to have MediaWiki on Gartner's "Magic Quadrant" for a Content Services Platforms (CSPs)
    • Bryan I've discussed Gartner's Magic Quadrants before, the key insight I had was that it's "vendors" that show up, not software. The vendors usually need to surpass some revenue (i.e. $20 Million Annual Recurring Revenue)

Actions

Search actions Add an action See this page for more information

All
None of these labels
+ MWStake