Talk:MediaWiki Usage Report 2015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (โโ) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* The downloads in China are remarkable high | * The downloads in China are remarkable high | ||
==Hosting== | ===Hosting=== | ||
* Thousands of installed MediaWiki on shared hosting (one-click) providers | * Thousands of installed MediaWiki on shared hosting (one-click) providers | ||
Revision as of 05:04, 16 October 2015
Trailer (Chris?)
Distribution
There's a huge wiki world beyond Wikimedia Foundation. (Sabine?)
Downloads
- The downloads in China are remarkable high
Hosting
- Thousands of installed MediaWiki on shared hosting (one-click) providers
Most downloaded extensions
Even to know, which extensions are popular is nearly impossible. Some data from December 2014 (shared by Legoktm) are interesting. And give a first impression of needed add-ons in wikis beyond the Wikimedia Foundation. Many "top 20" extensions already prove the intense use of MediaWiki in companies and organizations.
Comparisons with Wordpress and other content management systems
(Richard)
- Compare trends. Searches for Wordpress and MediaWIki, Confluence ...
- Comparison searches for wiki and blog: Wiki more popular. But MediaWiki is not the most important player
- Reason: No ecosystem for MediaWiki established, SMW, BlueSpice, Wikia, WMF ... working separated.
Typical MediaWiki users
(Sabine?)
Sizes of organization
Usage time of MediaWiki
Number of MediaWiki sites
Public and private sites
Number of users
Extensions and age of the used wikis
MediaWiki versions
Updates
Most important extensions
Reasons for using MediaWiki
Feature requests
(Richard)
Primary requirements
Secondary requirements
Community
Contributions for the community
Improvements and barriers
Next steps and requirements
(Chris, Mark, Markus, all .....)
- Reliability
- Standardization
- Services in core
- MediaWiki Foundation
See also
- Chris Koerner: MediaWiki User Report, Wikimania 2015
- MediaWiki Usage Questions