Event:131: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) (→) |
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) (→) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
#* What’s our position to conferences as the recently held SMWCon Fall 2020 and the scheduled EMWCon Spring 2021? | #* What’s our position to conferences as the recently held SMWCon Fall 2020 and the scheduled EMWCon Spring 2021? | ||
#* To summarize for today’s agenda I would propose to discuss the long-term goals and the linked plan as concrete deliverables. | #* To summarize for today’s agenda I would propose to discuss the long-term goals and the linked plan as concrete deliverables. | ||
# '''Project Canasta/MediaWiki Open Source Content Services Platform (MOSCoSP)''' | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Markus}} We (MWStake) are good at coordination, we can help with that | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Markus}} We could try to bring the 2 efforts together and acta as a hub to bring people together | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Cindy}} I agree, the worst possible outcome is to have both efforts split into two competing ideas. | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Cindy}} We can ease the demands & provide a bridge. | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Cindy}} Help connect each effort with community & experts | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Mark}} It seems we are in agreement, this meets with our strategic plan. What's the next step? | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Eric-Jan}} Someone needs to understand each goal & determine what is complimentary & unique so that both efforts can align and support the stakeholder needs, then work to accelerate them. | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Lex}} What is the status of MOSCoSP? | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Eric-Jan}} Between Wikibase Solutions and Hallo Welt!, we have 40 developers working in this. | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Mark}} I hate the name (MOSCoSP), propose "MediaWiki Open Source COntent services Workshop" (MOSCOW) | |||
# '''Marketing''' | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Eric-Jan}} Another goal is to have MediaWiki on [https://www.gartner.com/en Gartner's] "Magic Quadrant" for a [https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/content-services-platforms/vendors Content Services Platforms (CSPs)] | |||
#* {{Agenda presenter|Bryan}} I've discussed Gartner's Magic Quadrants before, the key insight I had was that it's "vendors" that show up, not software. The vendors usually need to surpass some revenue (i.e. $20 Million Annual Recurring Revenue) | |||
==Actions== | ==Actions== |
Revision as of 14:59, 20 January 2021
Date (UTC): | 15 January 2021 03:30:00 - 15 January 2021 04:00:00
|
---|---|
Attendees: | Bryan Hildebrand, Cindy Cicalese, Eric-Jan, Lex Sulzer, Mark Hershberger, Markus Glaser |
Click for time zone conversion
Notes
The meeting voice transcription is available on the talk page.
- 20215 key goals to focus on
- MWStake Membership
- Credit Card processing for all options (individual, corporate, donations, conference tickets, etc.)
- Acquiring new members
- Acquiring new sponsors
- Project Canasta/MediaWiki Open Source Content Services Platform (MOSCoSP)
- Agreeing on a direction and supporting it
- Conference Participation
- Taking on more responsibility for planning
- MWStake "Machinery/Processes"
- Board Membership
- Member (individual) voting
- Social Media Outreach
- Handling the MWStake Twitter account
- Promoting conferences
- MWStake Membership
- Eric-Jan Eric-Jan's email
- To me a strategy is no more (or less) than a plan of action to achieve our long-term goals. These goals should be defined and are consistent with our mission and vision. So, step 1 is to define long-term goals and step 2 is the plan how to achieve these goals. The plan comes down to: Who does what and when should it be ready.
- As far as strategy and goals are concerned, last year we have been mainly focusing on facilitating MediaWiki Stakeholder membership. This should be finalized by a working payment system and by getting new members on board. The acquisition plan to find members was adopted in April 2020.
- There are 2 current initiatives that require to determine our position and role on the strategic agenda:
- We could revitalize and review our workboard as potential input for our goals.
- What’s our position to conferences as the recently held SMWCon Fall 2020 and the scheduled EMWCon Spring 2021?
- To summarize for today’s agenda I would propose to discuss the long-term goals and the linked plan as concrete deliverables.
- Project Canasta/MediaWiki Open Source Content Services Platform (MOSCoSP)
- Markus We (MWStake) are good at coordination, we can help with that
- Markus We could try to bring the 2 efforts together and acta as a hub to bring people together
- Cindy I agree, the worst possible outcome is to have both efforts split into two competing ideas.
- Cindy We can ease the demands & provide a bridge.
- Cindy Help connect each effort with community & experts
- Mark It seems we are in agreement, this meets with our strategic plan. What's the next step?
- Eric-Jan Someone needs to understand each goal & determine what is complimentary & unique so that both efforts can align and support the stakeholder needs, then work to accelerate them.
- Lex What is the status of MOSCoSP?
- Eric-Jan Between Wikibase Solutions and Hallo Welt!, we have 40 developers working in this.
- Mark I hate the name (MOSCoSP), propose "MediaWiki Open Source COntent services Workshop" (MOSCOW)
- Marketing
- Eric-Jan Another goal is to have MediaWiki on Gartner's "Magic Quadrant" for a Content Services Platforms (CSPs)
- Bryan I've discussed Gartner's Magic Quadrants before, the key insight I had was that it's "vendors" that show up, not software. The vendors usually need to surpass some revenue (i.e. $20 Million Annual Recurring Revenue)
Actions
this page for more information
SeeAll | |||
---|---|---|---|
|