Event:89: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) (→: Added some notes) |
Bryandamon (talk | contribs) (→: Moar Notz) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
#** {{Action}} (Mark) I will work with Daren for Meza on Rasberry Pi | #** {{Action}} (Mark) I will work with Daren for Meza on Rasberry Pi | ||
#* (Lex) {{Action}} Regarding the "Participation Pool", I will contact my short list to help fund the conference with companies in the MediaWiki space, they will receive marketing based on their contribution | #* (Lex) {{Action}} Regarding the "Participation Pool", I will contact my short list to help fund the conference with companies in the MediaWiki space, they will receive marketing based on their contribution | ||
# '''(Bryan) Gave a brief discussion of the currently proposed MWStake membership dues and requested comments ([[Bylaws/Dues|mwstake.org]] or [[mw:Talk:MediaWiki Stakeholders' Group/Dues|mediawiki.org]]) | |||
# '''Boilerplate discussion''' | |||
#* (Lex) It would be good to have '''one''' single model for the current extension template | |||
#* (Mark) The conference would be a good place to start the discussion | |||
#* (Gergo) Added a link to [[mw:Best practices for extensions|Best practices for extensions]] | |||
#* (Lex) Great info, thanks Gergo | |||
#* (Ad) Shouldn't we have a group of extensions that are "MWStake maintained"? | |||
#** (Mark) Yes! We should "rehabilitate" some extensions that are commonly used | |||
#** (Lex) This idea keeps popping up, we need to '''DO IT'''! | |||
#** (Sabine) Proposed a "certificate" for extensions | |||
#** (Bryan) A good first step would be to collect all the extensions each of us consider crucial for Enterprise Knowledge Management, compare each individuals list to the groups, and decide as a group (MWStake) what the list should contain. Then we need to outline a process that defines how we certify, recheck, and mark the extension as certified as an ongoing and continuous process. | |||
# '''(Cindy) WMF moving towards a "graceful degradation" of support for 3rd parties''' | |||
# '''Discussion about switching from Visual Editor (VE) to Wiki Mark-up (Source) and back''' | |||
#* Currently you can switch from VE to Source without loss of data | |||
#* Switching from Source to VE without RESTBase isn't currently possible and installing and configuring RESTBase has proven challenging | |||
# '''(Bryan) Discussed the current problem with Scientific Publishing in the world and how MediaWiki may help''' | |||
#* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal | |||
# '''(Greg) Mentioned Approved Revs has an issue in big wikis''' | |||
#* (Greg) There are long delays for queries, does anyone know why? | |||
#* (Mark) Suggested updating the Phabricator task with an "explain" | |||
#* (Gergo) Mentioned using Structured Logging |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 7 June 2019
Date (UTC): | 7 June 2019 15:30:00 - 7 June 2019 16:30:00 |
---|---|
URL: | https://meet.google.com/mdd-ufhn-ksb |
Etherpad: | https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/mwstake-2019-06
|
Click for time zone conversion
Meeting agenda
- Wait for attendees & chat 5 min
Wiki Quickie 5 min DarenAnother focus on sidebars similar to last month, this will demonstrate how to use the DynamicSidebar extension
- Note: This will be postponed until next month.
- MWStake incorporation effort update 3 min Mark
- Bank Account, soon to have merchant account
- Call for comment on Activities and Operational Information
- MWStake proposed membership dues 5 min Bryan
- Call for comments on proposed MWStake membership Dues
- Update on SMWCon 2019 15 min Lex
- Proposed website
- Distributing talks, workshops and create camps across the 3 conference days?
- Parallel talk/workshop/create camp tracks?
- Conference Swag: MEZA Wiki on a USB Stick/RasPi?
- Participants Pool
- BoilerPlate extension maintenance 5 min Mark
- What actually needs to be done to the BoilerPlate extension?
- Third party support 5 min Cindy
- Third party support looking forward
- Scientific Publishing and MediaWiki 5 min Bryan
- Current efforts to improve scientific publishing in using MediaWiki
Notes
Shared notes: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/mwstake-2019-06
- (Greg) Upgraded all his wikis to 1.32.2 using Meza
- Asked if anyone else had, nobody volunteered, Greg is ahead of the game.
- (Mark) MWStake now has a bank account
- (Lex) Presented update on SMWCon 2019
- Asked for feedback on the new conference front page's 3 bullet points
- (Mark) Voiced his approval, especially #3
- (Lex) Mentioned that Airy mentioned both SMW and EMW be mentioned since it was EMWCon 2019 in Daly city that gained his involvement in the group
- (Sabine) What is the difference between "MW Data" and "SMW Data"
- (Sabine, Cindy, & Mark) Maybe change the first bullet to "knowledge" vs. data
- (Lex) One track or multiple track conference?
- (Lex) Wolfgang and Marie only are interested in the talks and they may represent other's views as well?
- (Cindy) We might want to consider their (Wolfgang & Marie) views as proxies for others, although we shouldn't design the conference around it
- (Cindy) Doesn't like the create camps and tutorials sprinkled through the conference
- (Lex) OK, so create camps and tutorials at the end
- (Lex) Would like to have conference swag like Meza installed on a Raspberry Pi but doesn't have the time to work out the bugs
- ACTION ITEM (Mark) I will work with Daren for Meza on Rasberry Pi
- (Lex) ACTION ITEM Regarding the "Participation Pool", I will contact my short list to help fund the conference with companies in the MediaWiki space, they will receive marketing based on their contribution
- Asked for feedback on the new conference front page's 3 bullet points
- (Bryan) Gave a brief discussion of the currently proposed MWStake membership dues and requested comments (mwstake.org or mediawiki.org)
- Boilerplate discussion
- (Lex) It would be good to have one single model for the current extension template
- (Mark) The conference would be a good place to start the discussion
- (Gergo) Added a link to Best practices for extensions
- (Lex) Great info, thanks Gergo
- (Ad) Shouldn't we have a group of extensions that are "MWStake maintained"?
- (Mark) Yes! We should "rehabilitate" some extensions that are commonly used
- (Lex) This idea keeps popping up, we need to DO IT!
- (Sabine) Proposed a "certificate" for extensions
- (Bryan) A good first step would be to collect all the extensions each of us consider crucial for Enterprise Knowledge Management, compare each individuals list to the groups, and decide as a group (MWStake) what the list should contain. Then we need to outline a process that defines how we certify, recheck, and mark the extension as certified as an ongoing and continuous process.
- (Cindy) WMF moving towards a "graceful degradation" of support for 3rd parties
- Discussion about switching from Visual Editor (VE) to Wiki Mark-up (Source) and back
- Currently you can switch from VE to Source without loss of data
- Switching from Source to VE without RESTBase isn't currently possible and installing and configuring RESTBase has proven challenging
- (Bryan) Discussed the current problem with Scientific Publishing in the world and how MediaWiki may help
- (Greg) Mentioned Approved Revs has an issue in big wikis
- (Greg) There are long delays for queries, does anyone know why?
- (Mark) Suggested updating the Phabricator task with an "explain"
- (Gergo) Mentioned using Structured Logging