Edit Event: Event:102

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: member.
You do not have permission to edit pages in the Event namespace.

Cancel

MWstake Meeting?

Yes No

Title:

MWstake meeting

Start Date:

Start Time (UTC):

:

End Date:

End Time (UTC):

:

URL:

Tags:

Attendees:

==Meeting agenda==
# '''Wait for attendees & chat''' {{Agenda time|5 min}}
# <del>'''Wiki Quickie''' {{Agenda time|5 min}} {{Agenda presenter|TBD}}</del>
# '''User survey''' {{Agenda time|20 min}} {{Agenda presenter|Mark}}
# '''Composer RFC discussion''' {{Agenda time|15 min}} {{Agenda presenter|Mark}}
# '''Wiki Watercooler''' {{Agenda time|remaining}} {{Agenda presenter|Open Mic}}

==Notes==
# '''Discussion with WMF CTO'''
#* (Richard) I had a meeting with Grant Ingersoll, CTO of WMF, regarding MediaWiki usage.
#* (Richard) We discussed the 2030 strategy process.
#* (Richard) He was very interested in what users/developers/consultants think (PHP vs. other languages, microservices, ACL, skinning, etc.).
# '''Update on the MediaWiki Blog'''
#* (Richard) Still coming, no ETA yet.
# '''User survey'''
#* (Mark) The survey was created by Jeroen for:
#*# Users and decision makers
#*# People who don't use MediaWiki yet
#* (Richard) We can advertise the survey through our channels, just need to know when the survey is finished
#* (Richard) #2 seems like the hardest to identify.  One way might be to send tweets with hashtags for Confluence, SharePoint, etc.
# '''Thoughts on the remote EMWCon'''
#* (Ike) This was the best we could do given the circumstances and was possibly the most informative conference I've attended.  That being said, there is a lot lost by not being in person
#* (Ike) Suggest that there should be guidance for who should watch developers vs. users
#* (Mark) Lex had a schema for that: [https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/w/images/3/38/MediaWikiAspects.png Conference organization schema]
#* (Cindy) How it usually happens:
#*# Send out a call for papers
#*# Wait for emails
#*# Guilt people into talking
#*# Collect what you can and group them thematically
#*# I've never had the luxury of a volume of talks to separate tracks
#* (Ike) We need conference attendees to be new users (vs. the same group that attends every year)
#* (Mark) People with these ideas should commit to helping organize in the future so Cindy isn't the only one
#* (Bryan) Given the success of the remote conference for attracting speakers and attendees who would not otherwise be able to attend, we should try to have a concurrent remote conference with every in-person conference
#** (Bryan) Possible downside might be the sentiment from NASA management.  If remote is a possibility, why should we send anyone in-person
#* (Bernhard) Maybe different costs base on in-person vs. remote attendance?
#* (Cindy) The remote portion functionally doesn't have a cost and we don't want to deter possible attendees
#* (Yeroen) Prefer if online is free.  It's a form of marketing.
#* (Bryan) We should coordinate all the social media platforms between SMW, EMW, and others.
#** SMW has a [https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/semantic-mediawiki.org:Services_accounts defined page] for who controls each platform
# '''Discussion about blogs / blogging platforms'''
#* [https://river.me/ Megan (River's) blog] using the [https://gohugo.io/ Hugo platform]
#* (Bernhard) Blogs should be SMW powered.
# '''Composer RFC'''
#* [[Request for Comment/Hybrid extension management]]
#* (Cindy) There is a need for a best practices page (e.g. Never use Composer to enable an extension, extension.JSON should load them)

==Action board==
{{Actionable board
|Open
|{{PAGENAME}}
|Extension, Conference
|True
|View
|{{PAGENAME}}
}}

Cancel

Edit Event: Event:102

Navigation menu

Search