Talk:MediaWiki Usage Report 2015

Trailer (Chris?)

Distribution

There's a huge wiki world beyond Wikimedia Foundation. (Sabine?)

Downloads

• The downloads in China are remarkable high

Hosting

• Thousands of installed MediaWiki on shared hosting (one-click) providers

Most downloaded extensions

Even to know, which extensions are popular is nearly impossible. Some data from December 2014 (shared by Legoktm) are interesting. And give a first impression of needed add-ons in wikis beyond the Wikimedia Foundation. Many "top 20" extensions already prove the intense use of MediaWiki in companies and organizations.

Comparisons with Wordpress and other content management systems

(Richard)

• Compare trends. Searches for Wordpress and MediaWIki, Confluence ...
• Comparison searches for wiki and blog: Wiki more popular. But MediaWiki is not the most important player
• Reason: No ecosystem for MediaWiki established, SMW, BlueSpice, Wikia, WMF ... working separated.

Typical MediaWiki users

The typical survey participant is either a developer/administrator or in management and works in a small organization with 25 or less people. Using MediaWiki now for over 5 years, he counts as long time user. He is managing 2–5 wikis, from which at least 1 is public and 1 private. The user sees 25 or less people on his wiki. The user uses MediaWiki because of it being Open Source and easy to use due to its similarity to Wikipedia. His public wiki is a fun site and his enterprise wiki is used for internal knowledge creation and management. He is unhappy with the upgrade process and the installation of new extensions and would like to see WordPress-like simple update buttons in the admin backend. For the enterprise wiki, access control and a functioning easy Visual Editor are important, but even more important is a slick, superpretty GUI. The user is part of the software community and contributes some feedback and bug reports. He also spreads the word. Irritating is the connection to Wikipedia and the scrambled software documentation, which isn't very user-friendly. Community-wise, he wishes for a master plan, good communication and easy ways of involvement to give back to the community and support the project.

Feature requests

(Richard)

Next steps and requirements

(Chris, Mark, Markus, all .....)

• Reliability
• Standardization
• Services in core
• MediaWiki Foundation

See also

• Chris Koerner: MediaWiki User Report, Wikimania 2015
• MediaWiki Usage Questions