Event:114: Difference between revisions

From MWStake
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(: Added Links)
()
 
Line 15: Line 15:
#* [[Action:46|Action Item]]
#* [[Action:46|Action Item]]
#* [https://manage.mwstake.org/wiki/C0398617288 Outline]
#* [https://manage.mwstake.org/wiki/C0398617288 Outline]
#* [https://smw-cindykate.com/main/Community:Component1713904056 Trusted Web of Colleagues (TWebC) Outline 1]
#* (Lex) We should provide a matching service via TWebC
#* [https://wiki.dataspects.com/wiki/Trusted_Web_of_Colleagues_(TWebC) Trusted Web of Colleagues (TWebC) Outline 1]
#** [https://smw-cindykate.com/main/Community:Component1713904056 Trusted Web of Colleagues (TWebC) Outline 1]
#** [https://wiki.dataspects.com/wiki/Trusted_Web_of_Colleagues_(TWebC) Trusted Web of Colleagues (TWebC) Outline 2]
#* (Bryan) Lex and I discussed reserving 4% of the dues for project management which would be $100 of Gold ($2,500) and $200 of Platinum ($5,000)
#** (Mark) I recommend a round # of 5% which would be $125 of Gold ($2,500) and $250 of Platinum ($5,000)
#* (Bryan) We shouldn't "sole source" the developer so make sure we aren't biased, ideally we can have 3 developers quote each project (pulled from TWebC)
#* (Cindy) Should TWebC be public or private?
#** Based on input from Cindy, Lex, and Bryan, it sounds like open is preferred
#* (Cindy) "Trusted" with regards to TWebC means certified by MWStake
# '''MediaWiki Blog'''
# '''MediaWiki Blog'''
#* (Mark from his communication with Markus) Using the domain (mediawiki.blog) will probably not be OK for us (MWStake) as is, but possibly OK if we were a [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organization_Agreement Thematic Group]
# '''Credit Card Processing'''
# '''Credit Card Processing'''
#* (Mark) Wikidata has an update via email
#* (Mark) If we want any changes made, we should make them quickly
#* (Bryan) What about conference dues or sponsor project costs if they go beyond (8 or 16 hours)?  Should we have an ability for an open field?
#** (Mark) Yes we should, we should reach out and discuss this
#* [[Action:47|Action Item]]
#* [[Action:47|Action Item]]
# '''Collection Extension'''
# '''Collection Extension'''
# '''Next Meeting'''
# '''Next Meeting'''
#* (Mark) {{Action}} A vote was called with a unanimous yes to have another meeting in a month (around August 14th)


==Actions==
==Actions==

Latest revision as of 16:23, 22 July 2020

Blank.png Date (UTC): 17 July 2020 02:30:00 - 17 July 2020 03:30:00

Person.png Attendees: Bryan Hildebrand, Cindy Cicalese, Evita Hollis, Lex Sulzer, Mark Hershberger

Click for time zone conversion

{{#copywatchers: Template:Event}}

Notes

The meeting voice transcription is available on the talk page.

  1. MWStake Brokerage
    • Action Item
    • Outline
    • (Lex) We should provide a matching service via TWebC
    • (Bryan) Lex and I discussed reserving 4% of the dues for project management which would be $100 of Gold ($2,500) and $200 of Platinum ($5,000)
      • (Mark) I recommend a round # of 5% which would be $125 of Gold ($2,500) and $250 of Platinum ($5,000)
    • (Bryan) We shouldn't "sole source" the developer so make sure we aren't biased, ideally we can have 3 developers quote each project (pulled from TWebC)
    • (Cindy) Should TWebC be public or private?
      • Based on input from Cindy, Lex, and Bryan, it sounds like open is preferred
    • (Cindy) "Trusted" with regards to TWebC means certified by MWStake
  2. MediaWiki Blog
    • (Mark from his communication with Markus) Using the domain (mediawiki.blog) will probably not be OK for us (MWStake) as is, but possibly OK if we were a Thematic Group
  3. Credit Card Processing
    • (Mark) Wikidata has an update via email
    • (Mark) If we want any changes made, we should make them quickly
    • (Bryan) What about conference dues or sponsor project costs if they go beyond (8 or 16 hours)? Should we have an ability for an open field?
      • (Mark) Yes we should, we should reach out and discuss this
    • Action Item
  4. Collection Extension
  5. Next Meeting
    • (Mark) ACTION ITEM A vote was called with a unanimous yes to have another meeting in a month (around August 14th)

Actions

Search actions Add an action See this page for more information

Open
None of these labels
+ MWStake